Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright

Confusion? My point was that, if it required twenty years of training to attain the required level of ability of performance, any thing of a “contemporary” nature would of necessity be discounted. As anyone can notice, contemporary music today requires very little in the way of effort, ability, or talent.


230 posted on 08/04/2014 2:12:23 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: odawg
...contemporary music today requires very little in the way of effort, ability, or talent.

ALL generalizations tend to be inaccurate...

231 posted on 08/04/2014 2:26:17 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

To: odawg

I knew that’s what you were going to say. It does not follow logically though. Doctors take almost a decade of training before they can practice, and they are constantly being updated on contemporary knowledge.

Second, you are saying the only music is the music in THE Temple. You can’t apply that here.

Third, when David “danced before the Lord” - there is no reason to think it was to old music.

Nice try. (What is your scriptural basis for this any way?)


232 posted on 08/04/2014 2:47:20 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson