Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee N. Field; Tax-chick
We had five. I've always thought that was a very nice size.

Five is a nice number. Many Americans go for the number two. Curiously, the Lebanese members of my parish seem to prefer the number three, with a few exceptions. It's quite fascinating, IMHO. Why three? I pointed this observation out to one of them but they acted surprised, as if it were unplanned. One family, perhaps, but 5, 6, 7 families ... each with 3 children? The exceptions include one family where #3 was twins. It's somewhat of a conundrum.

81 posted on 07/30/2014 3:50:10 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: NYer; Lee N. Field

I thought three was the most difficult. Of course, my 3rd was Tom ... if I hadn’t been pregnant again before I knew what hit me, we wouldn’t have had seven more, easier children after him.


87 posted on 07/30/2014 4:00:55 PM PDT by Tax-chick (No power in the 'verse can stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; Tax-chick
Five is a nice number. Many Americans go for the number two.

Crap happens. Two is a precarious number.

125 posted on 07/30/2014 7:20:06 PM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson