Don’t be hypocritical and accept *doctrinal development8 for some thing snot mentioned by name in Scripture and not others.
If it works for the eucharist, the papacy, the Trinity, and a whole host of other doctrines, then it’s inconsistent and hypocritical to disallow doctrines y’all don’t like, just because you don’t like them.
How is that hypocritical? The development of doctrine is not an exercise in equivalency where one can say, "what's good for the goose..." This understanding is nothing but a modern invention.
If it works for the eucharist, the papacy, the Trinity, and a whole host of other doctrines, then it’s inconsistent and hypocritical to disallow doctrines y’all don’t like, just because you don’t like them.
It's not about liking. It's about Truth. This is just another example of the protestant penchant to substitute truth for preference. There is but one authority charged with defining doctrine and that's the Catholic Church. No other individual or organization has that authority.
But that's the crux of the matter. If one accepts doctrines that have been developed from Scripture and Tradition then they must accept the material sufficiency of scripture and yield to the traditional authority that formally defined them.