Plagiarist, you did not simply present Catholic teachings, or a reiteration or snippet, but pasted over 400 words directly from another source (http://www.ewtn.com/library/CHRIST/CEPOPE.TXT) without any attribution, or otherwise presented any indication that they were your own.
This is not a matter of copyright violation and those of RF rules, as the CE is in public domain as far as i know, but it is clearly plagiarism.
But which is actually advised by at least one RC apologist.
Is that so? I don't see an attempt to take credit for another's work, which is one of the required elements for plagiarism.
Perhaps you owe Larry an apology