[verga]

Why did you invite e-s into the discussion of which he was not a part?

The same reason you ping the prot posse, and the fact that he does a much better job of dismantling your ludicrous belief in OSAS argument than I could.

The better question would be why don't you want him included?

[CynicalBear]

>>The same reason you ping the prot posse, and the fact that he does a much better job of dismantling your ludicrous belief in OSAS argument than I could.<<

The belief that OSAS is “ludicrous” demands that you believe that man is responsible for and thereby earns his own salvation. Is that what you believe?