Answer
In the Eastern rites of the Church it is common for married men to be ordained to the priesthood. Further, in the Latin rite there are a few married men, converted ministers from other faiths, who are ordained to the Catholic priesthood. This, however, is not common. Finally, in neither the Latin rite nor the Eastern rites do priests (or deacons) marry after they have been ordained, except in extraordinary circumstances.
The reasons Latin rite priests can’t marry is both theological and canonical.
Theologically, it may be pointed out that priests serve in the place of Christ and therefore, their ministry specially configures them to Christ.
catholic teaching...not biblical teaching
As is clear from Scripture, Christ was not married (except in a mystical sense, to the Church). By remaining celibate and devoting themselves to the service of the Church, priests more closely model, configure themselves to, and consecrate themselves to Christ.
again...outside of Christ being not married, the rest is catholic teaching.
As Christ himself makes clear, none of us will be married in heaven (Mt 22:23–30). By remaining unmarried in this life, priests are more closely configured to the final, eschatological state that will be all of ours.
outside of the first sentence...more catholic conjecture
Paul makes it very clear that remaining single allows one’s attention to be undivided in serving the Lord (1 Cor 7:32–35). He recommends celibacy to all (1 Cor 7:7) but especially to ministers, who as soldiers of Christ he urges to abstain from "civilian affairs" (2 Tm 2:3–4).
Big difference between recommending and forbidding.
Here is where catholic "tradition" takes over from Biblical teaching.
Canonically, priests cannot marry for a number of reasons. First, priests who belong to religious orders take vows of celibacy. Second, while diocesan priests do not take vows, they do make a promise of celibacy.
Third, the Church has established impediments that block the validity of marriages attempted by those who have been ordained. Canon 1087 states: "Persons who are in holy orders invalidly attempt marriage."
This impediment remains as long as the priest has not been dispensed from it, even if he were to attempt a civil marriage, even if he left the Church and joined a non-Catholic sect, and even if he apostatized from the Christian faith altogether. He cannot be validly married after ordination unless he receives a dispensation from the Holy See (CIC 1078 §2, 1).
http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/why-cant-a-priest-ever-marry
Your quotes don't add up to any infringement on freedom, since there is nothing compulsory about taking a vow. You do realize this is voluntary celibacy, right?
You do realize that a person who has vowed celibacy, has vowed it to God?
You do realize that a priest who wants out, can do so with permission (be laicized) or without permission (just walk out)?
In the later case, he faces ecclesiatical penalties; but if he's the kind of guy who breaks his vows to God, why would he give two hoots about ecclesiastical penalties? He's still free to be as unfaithful as he wants.
You do realize that the Church also forbids breaking the Marriage vows in a valid marriage, too --- right? Do you think the Church is wrong to frown on the breaking of those voluntary vows?
This is no offense against freedom, since a person freely makes vows, preistly ones, or marital ones, if he wants to. And if he doesn't want to, he doesn't.
Or perhaps you do not understand that people have a right to make vows, take them seriously, and expect that others will take them seriously.