Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
And then explain to me why exactly, sola Scriptura is not valid.....

That's easy. Because Scripture doesn't explicitly include by name the above Catholic teachings.

50 posted on 06/27/2014 12:13:44 PM PDT by steve86 ( Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: steve86

How does that answer the question?

If those teachings are acceptable to the RCC without being named by name, then why is sola Scritpura disallowed BECAUSE it is not named by name?

If SS is disallowed because it’s not explicitly spelled out in Scritpura and named by name, then why do those Catholic doctrines get a pass?


51 posted on 06/27/2014 1:04:25 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson