To: editor-surveyor; boatbums; Oldeconomybuyer; RightField; aposiopetic; rbmillerjr; Lowell1775; ...
So if Scripture is sufficient, you and ‘bums would be able to agree, you cannot.
Q.E.D.
1,043 posted on
07/09/2014 11:07:48 PM PDT by
narses
(Matthew 7:6. He appears to have made up his mind let him live with the consequences.)
To: narses
Excellent example of the abysmal ignorance of what sola Scriptura actually means. Thanks for playing!
1,044 posted on
07/09/2014 11:38:37 PM PDT by
boatbums
(Proud member of the Free Republic Bible Thumpers Brigade.)
To: narses; boatbums
“Bums” is much like you, in refusing the plain language of scripture, in favor of the words of deceiving nicolaitans.
The only difference between you and her is which nicolaitans to believe over the plain words of scripture.
.
1,061 posted on
07/10/2014 10:06:02 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: narses
Do all Catholics agree on every point of Catholic doctrine?
Which is really a rhetorical question because we all know the answer to that.
The very thing that you claim invalidates sola Scriptura, also invalidates *sacred tradition* and your so-called *infallible magisterium*.
1,195 posted on
07/12/2014 6:45:11 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson