I don't know what to make of your remarks. You don't seem to notice several things:
- That she is single, abstinent, and chaste
- that she "disagrees, sometimes sharply" with other friends/acquaintances about this
- that she notices that so-called "gay friendly Christians'" "preexisting theology—not only on marriage but on creation, embodiment, and Scriptural interpretation—has begun to shift to match the new unisex or gender-neutral model of marriage"---- which means they are upending their entire so-called "belief system" to accommodate this shift on "gay": Tushnet, describing this, does not approve.
And this article is, precisely, speaking the truth to them.
Well done, too.
So the main reason I’m planning on celibacy for the foreseeable future is just that I’m Catholic and lesbian and them’s the rules, bud.
How do you respond to the above? Perversion is still her main identity. Notice those words foreseeable future, she is still justifying and hedging her bets.
I do not judge her salvation, that is Jesus call, but really look at the fruit. This is an article with an agenda. It has some nice words that we want to hear but be wise.
When she is ashamed to even discuss her past life, then she is truly broken, it will no longer be about her.