[Mrs. Don-o]

I do wonder whether they cut her article-length, as editors sometimes do. I too, noticed that she was promising "more on this" but didn't expand on that.

She doesn't expound on it, she merely touches on it, here

" If I believed that Catholicism condemned gay people to a barren, loveless life, I would not be Catholic, full stop."

Then she goes on to expound just a tiny bit on purity/chaste friendship.

[piusv]

OK, thanks .... at least I know I’m not blind. :-)

[CynicalBear]

What a great thought provoking article. As I read down through the comments I’m amazed at how often you have had to explain what the article says. It’s obvious the comments come before reading the article. From total preconceived assumptions to haughty “I’ve never been tempted by anything” attitudes. It’s sad to watch comments that clearly are not based on having read the article.

The writer has obviously understood the “go sin no more” command and made a conscious decision to stop the sinful act.