Who are you trying to convince?
I explained how it went.
As I also made note of, as it began it was a thing of some complexity & subtlety (which makes it difficult to dig out and point at simply) along with one comment of your own which showed particular aspect of your own mind and intents --which was deleted.
Ye still there is an underlying pattern, with this continuance itself a part of it all as far as I can tell --as deflection away from all else which I have said (there being no mention of those other aspects much besides to misconstrue one portion when superficially possible to do so) coupled with what appears to me to be continuing open attempt to in whichever way possible bring discredit upon myself.
Is that so others won't listen when I bring truthful evidence that seriously would rock the Romish boats?
Again, it's not my fault that "Rome" misrepresents itself.
Imagine how difficult it is for one to not assume that deflection away from that particular central concept be much the major thrust of this continuance of conversation in regards to this personality conflict side-bar. We both us know what has transpired here. Or at least I do.
I have to assume you do also, or else assume something negative concerning your own intellectual abilities, which I cannot do for to do so would be contrary to much else plainly enough in evidence.
Lots of effort in your post again.
It’s really simple: post one example to support your accusation.
Can you?
If you want to withdraw your accusation and continue the debate, that might be a good idea now.