>>>Still didnt read the whole thing ey? ROFLOL!<<<
Why would I waste my time on them, “Saint” Cynical? I read enough about them to know they are not Presbyterian? And I already have enough dirt on the dispensational cult; so I really don’t need theirs.
Philip
ROFLOL!!! They were just fine when you thought they agreed with you but now not so much ey? Well, let me help ya out there.
http://www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/?p=3079
Under Here we will deal with the partial preterism, from this point on designated just preterism.
So when he says Preterist from this point hes talking about those who use the 70ad meme.
We have seen how far the preterist gangrene has spread. Very little teaching on the second coming remains after preterism has consumed most of the New Testament prophecies. Many preterists such as Gentry, DeMar, and Sproul, are not yet full preterists. Not yet. One full-blown preterist was J. Stuart Russell, who taught that the resurrection of the dead, the final judgment and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ have all been fulfilled in the past. All was fulfilled in A.D. 70, J. Stuart Russell, The Parousia: A Critical Inquiry into the New Testament Doctrine of Our Lords Second Coming, with an introduction by R. C. Sproul. Russells heretical hyperpreterist gangrene is deadly. Like Hymenaeus and Philetus, Russell, who lived in the 19th century, was guilty of profane and vain babblings and has increased unto more ungodliness, (II Tim. 2:16-18). Like Hymenaeus and Philetus, Russells word eats like gangrene. In spite of Russells heresy even partial preterists praise his writings. Although Gentry refers to Russell as an advocate of radical preterism, he still praises The Parousia as masterfully written, even though Paul calls his doctrine heresy! Gentry, He Shall Have Dominion, a Post-millennial Eschatology, pg 270-271.
As a minister of Christ, I must write what I believe to be true with regard to this subject. I do so, but with no joy in my heart, because I know that I am criticizing many that I love in the Lord. I feel it is my duty to call attention to what I believe to be error in the teaching of the partial preterism
Kenneth Gentry admits that it is true that [Christ] will come at the end of history, bringing about the resurrection and the judgment (Acts 1:11, I Thess. 4:13ff., I Cor. 15:20-26), Gentry, The Beast of Revelation, pg 25. Chilton condemns a denial of any future bodily resurrection or judgment as a heretical form of preterism, Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation, pg 531. The question is, will the preterist gangrene end here or will it develop into full preterism? Let us beware that the preterist gangrene does not overthrow the faith and the hope of the Church.
That hope is the Second Coming of the Jesus Christ. Why is eschatology important? It is important because it influences the interpretation of so many passages of Scripture. About 30 per cent of Scripture is prophecy. It is also important because the church is in danger of neglecting the doctrine of Christs coming again. The Lord exhorts us to watch. In the parable of the ten virgins all ten, representing the visible church, slumbered and slept. During the interval between the first and second coming of Christ the whole church will be in danger of ignoring to a great extent Christs personal return to earth. His Apostles likewise exhorts awake thou that sleepest, Eph 5:14. The preterists do not look for Christs second advent any time soon. Chilton thinks it may be 1000s of years away. Are not he and his fellow preterists slumbering and sleeping? Do they have their lamps trimmed?