>>>I understand that it’s all meaningless to you Philip. What do you think all of us have been trying to do? It’s trying to get you to understand what scripture is really saying. Alas, it seems futile still.<<<
How about countering my points in #154, if you can. All of them. One shouldn’t ignore scriptures they don’t happen to like; or that don’t fit neatly inside their self-imposed little box. Avoiding the tough challenges is not the sign of an eschatological doctrine grounded in faith.
Philip
Quote: “But these are good things to bring to light. Did knowledge increase during the 500-600 years from the time Daniel wrote the book until the time of Christ? I imagine so.” You “imagine”? We are supposed to comment seriously on your imaginings? Give me a break.
Quote: “More meaningless misdirection. Did Jesus tell John NOT to seal the book of prophecy? Yes. Daniel sealed it; and Christ unsealed it, beginning in Revelation 6, shortly after his resurrection.”
Revelation 6 hasn’t happened yet. Revelation was written after AD70 and that has been proven to you over and over again.
Quote: “Only a remnant was saved, and they became the "144,000" of all the tribes sealed as servants of God and of the Lamb.”
Well then I guess you are sol dude. Good luck with that.
Quote: “And don't believe any of the dispensational spin relating to the the Jews rejecting Christ as their king.”
I haven’t heard anyone claim that. They rejected Him as their messiah.
Quote: “Notice how that passage correlates to the Great Whore, Babylon the Great of the Revelation.”
No, I don’t. That’s in you Philip theology and Preterist thinking. It’s so much drivel.
Get the picture? Your entire post is fodder for jokes but nothing else.