[PhilipFreneau]

>>>He was not a Hebrew, and thus was not a legitimate King. He was a Roman puppet. Herod’s authority came not from Yehova, but from Rome. Yes, all that Herod did was an action of Rome.<<<

So, Jesus said Herod was responsible for the blood of the apostles? Where can I find that?

Where can I find anything that Jesus blamed on the Romans, except for the forty and two month rampage of Nero, the Beast, in the Revelation?

Philip

[editor-surveyor]

There is not one word about Nero in Revelation, nor any other part of God’s word. Revelation was written in 91 AD.

[CynicalBear]

>>Nero was the beast of Revelation<<

So the Jews worshiped Nero and that’s why they bore the wrath of God? No kidding? Wow, I wonder how historians and the apostles missed that one?

[kjam22]

If the beast of Revelation was Nero... it sure would have been cleaner for John to just say "Nero". It gets pretty dicey when we interpret scripture to be about past events when it doesn't say it is about past events... and doesn't name the persons from the past it is suppose to be about.

It would have really been easy to say "Nero" if it was about Nero. I know... it was written in code that only the church of that time would understand... whatever.