I’m not even going to give that post the credibility of a response. It supposes replacement theology / supersessionism which I understand you Preterists think is true but is blatantly false.
>>>I’m not even going to give that post the credibility of a response. It supposes replacement theology / supersessionism which I understand you Preterists think is true but is blatantly false.<<<
Your posts are of a consistent “trash and burn” pattern because you don’t know how to respond to anything outside that phony box created by your dispensational cult idols and proven charlatans, John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Ingerson Scofield.
Philip