He does that consistently ...offering scriptural alternative to various Romish claims, adding documentation from many sources, along with a bit of his own testimony also.
Part of it is the daily barrage on the pages of FreeRepublic regarding "all things [Roman] Catholic", which statements he often shows are incorrect (otherwise known as "not true") even if it be not true *quite* as stated.
Many times this can hinge on just what is "the church" itself, for that body is certainly not limited to the Romish one -- while that one can be seen to have been at various junctures to have been preaching a Gospel different than the early church (up to the Council of Orange, perhaps). Thank God for the Reformation. It was necessary, and can still be of assistance.
Count the threads promoting [Roman] Catholicism, which often (but not universally) entails lumping all others into some heap which scorn is then directed towards by some participant or another, if not hinted at or more openly stated in the posted article.
Every day, day after day for years. It has to number in the thousands, with some amount of repetitious comments usually worse (more bigoted towards those not RC, or those in some manner critical of particular aspects of Romish theology and/or history) than the articles posted, themselves easily numbering in the tens of thousands, among many hundreds of thousands of comments and replies.
Meanwhile, you appear to me to keep going the "getting personal" route, rather than sticking with discussion of whatever issue are raised.
Please--STOP doing that. Or go caucus up -- that's an option -- but from there, criticism of others is frowned upon. One cannot hide behind a caucus designation to shoot spitwads at others.