The rest of your post had nothing to do with being Alex nor being Calvinist. What was the point of the preamble, then?
Alex:
The point is that Zionist and I have been down this road before with the higher criticism stuff. The Catholic blogger endorsed nothing regarding higher criticism, so Zionist argument was 100% dishonest and made implicit accusations about the Catholic blogger that were outright false.
The central points of the blog were that the movie is not written from a Literal line by line account from Genesis, never the less, its stays true to the core of the salvific truths and in a pretty much direct way, is a pro-life movie, which coming from Hollywood, is a miracle in itself.
Given the points above, the author hypothesizes that those in American society who are more secular might be inclined to see the movie and that could open up a chance for dialogue with said individuals and some of those said folks might return back to their Christian roots, if they are lapsed, or may be open to exploring the Christian Message for the first time.
So the 2nd part of the post was directed at Zionist. The OP of mine was addressed to you as again, the Catholic blogger wrote why in his opinion, Catholics should not ex ante reject seeing the movie. Again, he said nothing regarding Calvinist or whatever group Zionist associates with.