“Still waiting for such evidence. I still only see assertions.”
That Buddhism is over 2,000 years old? I don’t understand what you are looking for me to provide.
Perhaps I am looking for some evidence from you to refute the history of Scriptures.
True a poster made the claim “history tells the story.” For a believer that is reassuring or even for a seeker. But for the skeptic as yourself, it matters not. So please present your case on why the OT and NT Scriptures are myth and lack historical evidence.
As an aside note, I try to be fair in all discussions. So I have to give you notice that in order to make your claim against the Scriptures you may just have to read them, examine them.