Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know what’s worse, a scientist trying to use science to disprove the Bible or a new earther trying to turn the Bible into a science book.


4 posted on 03/03/2014 9:56:38 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goodwithagun

Well I think the first one is much worse. I do agree the Bible is not a science book. Would be interesting however to see what a replica would actually look like.


10 posted on 03/03/2014 10:03:59 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: goodwithagun

If God is real and He inspired the men who wrote the Bible, then that makes the Bible a science book. Or at least a book that does not conflict with science...since God is, well, God, with the inherent implication that if He created everything then He also created the laws of nature, physics, etc.


16 posted on 03/03/2014 10:14:04 AM PST by pajama pundit ("SIN is not a family value, either")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: goodwithagun

It’s not a science book,

but the science

that is in the Bible is true.


32 posted on 03/03/2014 12:37:04 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: goodwithagun

Give me hundred twenty million and I think I could care for some widows, shelter orphans and help the poor...

But I am not a christian CEO...


40 posted on 03/03/2014 4:56:34 PM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson