The 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized a woman’s right to murder the baby she was carrying was the biggest judicial reach in the history of Supreme Court. There is no right to murder in the Constitution. From the moment of conception the mother is carrying another human being in her womb, awaiting for the birth of that person.
We are talking about two people from the moment of conception. A real breathing person. It is not a “thing” that the woman can murder at will. When Roe w. Wade is finally overturned, and it will be because most people now realize abortion is murdering another person, it will also include abortions of any types and yes that includes rape and incest.
If you want to murder someone if a woman is raped and becomes pregnant, kill the SOB that brutalized her and got her pregnant, not the innocent child that had nothing to do with the way she/he came into this world.
A nation that murders it’s own is not fit to be called a nation.
Well, I don’t disagree with anything you said except the likelihood that Roe v Wade will be overturned.
I just don’t see that happening in this country, and further I personally do not support a law which would force a woman to bear the child of the man that raped her.
I believe bearing that child is a decision that she must make and should make. I also believe that she have the ability to choose otherwise, even though I believe such a decision is indeed a tragic one.
I also believe that rape should result in the death penalty being considered on a case by case basis.