Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gemoftheocean; wmfights; Gamecock
We decided WHAT WAS GOSPEL. There were a lot of books floating around out there. We decided the canon. Not your little sect. You’re using OUR book.

On what basis did "you" (presuming "you" means "the Catholic church") decide "what was (the) Gospel", out of "a lot of books floating out there"?

68 posted on 02/07/2014 9:39:05 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy

Alex, here’s a pretty good relatively short read re: the canonicity of the New Testament. There is also a fairly lengthy article about the topic in the New Jerome Bible study. [It’s quite expensive, but a good library may have a copy. You should certainly be able to find one at any good Catholic university in the area.]

At any rate, here is the reference in question. [And it IS a very interesting topic.] http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm


76 posted on 02/07/2014 10:12:23 AM PST by gemoftheocean (...geez, this all seems so straight forward and logical to me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy; gemoftheocean; wmfights; Gamecock
gem: We decided WHAT WAS GOSPEL.

LOL

What a tired old talking point. Just a little research reveals that the Holy Spirit guided Born Again Christians in seeing which books were inspired and which to reject. Just one example is the quick rejection of the "Protoevangelium of James". This book written in the 2nd century was rejected before the Roman church was able to use state power to enforce it's will.

IOW, there was very little controversy concerning what was inspired and what wasn't. The only time some council was called, or a bishop made some sweeping declaration, was because pagan beliefs were growing within a given area. Also, these supposed authoritative statements only start showing up several generations after the Apostolic Era had ended. The fact there wasn't more controversy earlier is a testimony to how seriously Christians viewed Scripture.

79 posted on 02/07/2014 10:28:20 AM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy; gemoftheocean; aMorePerfectUnion; Salvation; redleghunter
We decided WHAT WAS GOSPEL. There were a lot of books floating around out there. We decided the canon. Not your little sect. You’re using OUR book.

On what basis did "you" (presuming "you" means "the Catholic church") decide "what was (the) Gospel", out of "a lot of books floating out there"?

Me first! I have yet to get an answer to my often asked questions as to the polemic behind this often made "we gave you the Bible" assertion.

The argument seems to be that the instruments, discerners and and stewards of Holy Writ (Rome presumes she is the NT church) are the infallible interpreters of it. And that such an infallible magisterium is necessary to recognize and establish both men and writings of God as being so, and thus its judgment on what it rejects or affirms must be submitted to.

Maybe this RC will answer this if they have an argument.

112 posted on 02/07/2014 6:33:28 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson