Who said they were not? I certainly didn’t. I simply said they were representative (aka examples) of what error can creep into churches and what needs done to correct. Surly your reading comprehension is better than what I see here.
>>In other words, there is no foundation to dispensational doctrine: it is based on selective interpretation.<<
Poor reading comprehension on your part does not make for error on my part.
You: >>>>Who said they were not? I certainly didn’t. I simply said they were representative (aka examples) of what error can creep into churches and what needs done to correct. Surly your reading comprehension is better than what I see here.<<<<
Where does it say they are "representative" Churches. Where does it say anything except they are "THE seven churches in Asia?" I know that you are voicing a dispensational myth, and that is most likely all you have ever heard; but I want proof of your speculation.
I repeat: there is no foundation to dispensational doctrine. It is based on selective interpretation.
Philip