>>If you take the other parts of the prophecy literally, shouldn't you also take that one literally?<<
Philip, with all sincerity I urge you to stop promoting the theory you are promoting here and do some study on Biblical and prophetic imagery. You are so far off track a person through this type of forum wouldnt know where to start.
>>>Philip, with all sincerity I urge you to stop promoting the theory you are promoting here and do some study on Biblical and prophetic imagery. You are so far off track a person through this type of forum wouldnt know where to start.<<<
Cynical Bear, with all sincerity, you have proven nothing except you have an opinion. Where is the beef? Prove that all those images John presented in the Revelation are literal! You can’t, because they are not. All one has to do is take the time to look back on the very short history of dispensationalism to realize that all modern day false prophecies come from dispensationalists. It is all made up out of whole cloth.
Philip
You didn’t answer my question.
If you take the other parts of the prophecy literally, shouldn’t you also take that one literally?