>>>You sure use a lot of non Scriptural sources and suppositions in your theories.<<<
I posted lots of scripture supporting my position the other day, and you discounted that, as well. In fact, I answered half-dozen, or so, of your specific questions; but instead of posting contradictory/rebuttal scripture, you complained that I was tying up the thread (you know, you could have done that before asking all those pointed questions.)
Why not post some rebuttal scripture or history? Certainly your doctrine has a solid scriptural and historical foundation, or you wouldn’t believe it.
Philip
First of all. Your theory contradicts Daniel’s prophecy. Second, to think that the destruction of Jerusalem was somehow the tribulation flies in the face of History. Damascus is still inhabited. Satan has not been chained and he is still the ruler of this world. As prophesied Israel is once again a nation. I could go on and on. Those and other consideration make your theory unworkable.