The process is interesting, though, as is the reportage. For example, this headline says "Commission claims apparitions are 'no hoax'," while the text says, "no proof it's a hoax." Big difference.
I went to Mediugorje in the late 90’s.
I had my own personal experience - which counts for squat in these matters of course.
I didn’t realize at the time how contentious the debate was - as I wasn’t hooked up to the Internet yet.
I’ve always been amazed at how both sides have dug in.
Whether its a yes or a no - you will see a bunch of people become very angry.
I’m rooting for “truth”
I trust that after all the interviews and looking at all the pros and cons ... Our Church will make a good decision.