“The Didache is highly suspect.”
If the Didache is suspect, then so is Euripedes, who dates far later, whom you cited to claim that that passage is a late addition. IOW, part of a conspiracy to keep you guys down. And if Ignatius is suspect too, who predates both the Didace and Euripedes, then there is nothing suspect also. Thus we are left again with the scripture, and again with the phrase “In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit,” whether your sophistry approves of it or not.
If the Didache is suspect, then so is Euripedes, who dates far later, whom you cited to claim that that passage is a late addition. IOW, part of a conspiracy to keep you guys down. And if Ignatius is suspect too, who predates both the Didace and Euripedes, then there is nothing suspect also. Thus we are left again with the scripture, and again with the phrase “In the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit,” whether your sophistry approves of it or not.
From Proof of the Gospel (the Demonstratio) by Eusebius. Eusebius (265-339 CE) Bishop of Caesarea around 314 CE How is your reading comprehension ? Euripedes ?
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach