Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: I want the USA back
It's a little more complicated than that.

In the post-Carolingian era, high born laymen would treat bishops and priests who were commoners as if they were servants and inferiors.

One of the ways in which the Church responded was by conferring titles of honor on clergy to insist that titled laity treat their pastors with more respect.

Another way, of course, was by selecting bishops and abbots from among the nobly-born clergy.

I for one am glad that the Church asserted itself by creating its own nobility rather than just allowing secular nobility to dominate and direct the Church as if it were a mere adjunct of earthly politics.

But yes, these titles and distinctions are less meaningful in an era when the ability to deliver blocs of votes is more important than birth as a measure of social power.

The same problem remains, however: how will the Christian clergy develop the proper esprit de corps to challenge the disdain and disrespect they increasingly receive from secular politicians?

Ending outmoded honors does not provide a full answer.

19 posted on 01/04/2014 4:11:48 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
how will the Christian clergy develop the proper esprit de corps to challenge the disdain and disrespect they increasingly receive from secular politicians?

How about they act in an exemplary Christlike way?

My pastor is very well loved and respected. He oversees one of the largest parishes in the Philadelphia Archdiocese. He is a Monsignor but that is not why he is respected.

32 posted on 01/05/2014 4:56:48 AM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson