Then neither is it yours.
You can't be telling him he can't define it without you, by default, defining it yourself.
Because nothing gives you the right over someone else to dictate definitions.
Because nothing gives you the right over someone else to dictate definitions.
***Except that earlier he seemed to hide behind the skirts of catholicism, so we should be able at a minimum to use catholic definitions. No doubt he will feel the relativistic need to assert relativism over catholicism, but that’s an exercise for future baloneyism.
>> Then neither is it yours.
I suppose you don’t realize you’re bolstering my point.
I’m surprised by the sensitivity concerning my trivial, but sound statement concerning who is not excluded from Christianity. Maybe it’s not about arrogance after all.