Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice; CynicalBear; daniel1212

I have answered all questions several times. There is but one Gospel and both Peter and Paul preached the same.

I have also posted several times the names of the dispensational theologians and none of them agree with your point of a “kingdom” dispensation within or just before a “grace” dispensation.

Every one of them have but one dispensation after the Cross and that is the “church” or “grace” dispensation. All of them Darby, Ironside, Schofield, Walvood and Ryrie (and many others) all of them one dispensation for grace/church age. Most of them above had to publish books refuting that they imply any other way of Salvation other than the shed Blood of Christ.

All of the above theologians are the ‘giants’ of dispensationalism.

I would like to know which theologian, pastor or book writer agrees with the theory you state.


233 posted on 11/25/2013 3:28:23 PM PST by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: redleghunter; daniel1212; CynicalBear; Iscool
"And I went up by REVELATION, and COMMUNICATED unto them THAT GOSPEL which I preach AMONG THE GENTILES, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain."(Gal. 2:2)

"But contrariwise, when they (Peter and the 11) saw that the GOSPEL of the UNCIRCUMCISION was COMMITTED UNTO ME, as the GOSPEL of the CIRCUMCISION was UNTO PETER; (for he that wrought effectually in Peter to the APOSTLESHIP OF THE CIRCUMCISION, the same was mighty in ME TOWARD THE GENTILES:)(Gal. 2:7,8)

"And WHEN James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, PERCEIVED THE GRACE that was GIVEN UNTO ME, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision."(Gal. 2:9).

"THAT GOSPEL I preach among the Gentiles"..."the gospel of the circumcision/the gospel of the uncircumcision"..."the GRACE THAT WAS GIVEN TO ME"...

If these are the same gospels, why did Paul have to communicate THAT GOSPEL to the 12? It would have been the same they had been given. They added nothing to Paul, but HE shared with them THAT GOSPEL he preached among the Gentiles. WHY, if they were the same?

And how did Paul know that his was different and that he would go by revelation of Christ to Jerusalem to communicate THAT GOSPEL with the 12?

"But I CERTIFY you, brethren, that THE GOSPEL WHICH WAS PREACHED OF ME IS NOT AFTER MAN. For I NEITHER RECEIVED IT OF MAN, NEITHER WAS I TAUGHT IT, but by the REVELATION OF JESUS CHRIST."(Gal. 1:11,12).

How? Because the Gospel of the CIRCUMCISION is NOT the same as the Gospel of the UNCIRCUMCISION. If they were the same, what in the world could Paul have added to them about it?

They are DIFFERENT. One is for a Kingdom of Believers (The Circumcision), the other is for a Body of Believers(The Uncircumcision).

Do you know how much sleep I will lose because "none of them agree" with me? Not much. Do you know how much sleep I would lose if I refused to study GOd's Word God's Way? A LOT.

No, you have not answered all questions several times. Where will Paul be when the Kingdom is set up, and Peter and the 11 are seated on twelve thrones, judging the 12 tribes of Israel? If they preached the SAME gospel, they should be seated at the same place. Next to Christ on His throne. I'll wait until you can get the answer. It's very important.

235 posted on 11/25/2013 4:02:15 PM PST by smvoice (HELP! I'm trapped inside this body and I can't get out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson