Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redleghunter

I don’t see any 1545 bible at that link. I see a modern reprinting of that bible. Luther treated the NT deuterocanonicals the same way he treated the OT ones: he separated them into the back of the Testament, and inserted a preface denying their authenticity.


69 posted on 11/04/2013 1:19:02 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: dangus
I don’t see any 1545 bible at that link. I see a modern reprinting of that bible. Luther treated the NT deuterocanonicals the same way he treated the OT ones: he separated them into the back of the Testament, and inserted a preface denying their authenticity.

He did not have NT deutercanonicals. I think this was disproved a few times on this thread. The link I sent you has the entire list of OT and NT which were published in 1545.

76 posted on 11/04/2013 3:14:52 PM PST by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson