Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

One last point:

The whole reason Luther argued against the canonicity of the deuterocanonicals is because they flatly contradicted his doctrine. And again, the Protestant issue with their canonicity is over whether there exists some distinction between an “ecclesiastical canon” and a “scriptural canon.”

But what of it?

A single passage of Maccabees teaches participatory atonement, prevening grace, prayer for the deceased and the existence of a sentient state in the afterlife that may not be defined precisely enough within Maccabees to be called “purgatory,” but certainly is neither Heaven or eternal damnation.

If one believes Protestant theology, Maccabees becomes perhaps the most damnable book ever written, the most grave moral threat to salvation comprehensible, the very defect of the Catholic church which Protestants believe Catholics can only be saved in spite of. So whereas a Catholic (such as St. Jerome) may find such doctrines hinted at in other books (1 Peter, Hebrew, James, Revelation, etc.), and could reasonably distinguish between a “scriptural book” useful for establishing the authority of the Church and an “ecclesiastical book” using for strengthening and teaching catechumens who have already accepted that authority, how can a Protestant begin to accept such a notion? Jerome’s alleged belief may be plausible to the readers of the Glossa Ordinaria, but how can it be plausible to any reasonable Protestant?


57 posted on 11/02/2013 1:14:41 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

“The whole reason Luther argued against the canonicity of the deuterocanonicals is because they flatly contradicted his doctrine.”

No. The closest one came come to a doctrine ‘proved’ by the Apocrypha would be prayer for the dead, which even then is suggested by one or two verses. Luther had no ‘need’ to remove the Apocrypha over doctrine. He removed it for the same reason Jerome rejected it - because it was not good for doctrine, correction and reproof, as scripture is. It was not accepted as scripture by Jesus or the Apostles.

To challenge the Catholic Church on theology, all Luther needed to do was translate the New Testament and get it into the hands of commoners. Scripture is an arrow in the heart of Catholic theology.


58 posted on 11/02/2013 2:21:46 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson