Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus
I did mean to write, "Every single Protestant discussion of the canon or St. Jerome's opinion of the canon that I've ever read excludes his prefaces to the Book of Judith and to the Book of Tobit."

Such is the difficulty of not having editors, or the ability to fix a post once you've made it: I'm sure there must be some honest discussion of the canon out there, somewhere.

2 posted on 10/30/2013 2:10:39 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

Also of note: if you read “But it is better to decide to displease the opinions of the Pharisees and to be subject to the commands of bishops” as merely saying that the bishops said it was the canon, but it was not, then you’ve established that St. Jerome is denying sola scriptura by this statement.


3 posted on 10/30/2013 2:12:46 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangus; GarySpFc
I'm sure there must be some honest discussion of the canon out there, somewhere.

Thank you for your honest statement. When there is doubt we should lean on the Words of The Good Shepherd:

Luke 24:

44 And he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything that is written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and psalms must be fulfilled.” 45 Then he opened their minds to understand the scriptures, 46 and said to them, “Thus it is written that the Christ would suffer and would rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and repentance and the forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in his name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.

64 posted on 11/04/2013 11:57:17 AM PST by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson