Questions for "Bible Christians" that they can't answer - Part 2

Catholic Convert ^ | October 27, 2013 | David Palm and Steve Ray

[smvoice]

...so where does that little thingy about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and Adam and Eve eating of its fruit, and thus bringing sin and death upon all humanity fit into your creation theory?

[Iscool]

You're appealing to the authority of Scripture to give the church its authority after rejecting the authority of Scripture in post 5.

HaHaHa...They are using the authority of the scripture to give them the authority to reject the scripture...

All the nuts ain't in the trees...

[SumProVita]

I changed NADA.

[verga]

You have been told the truth by me and nothing less. If you choose to ignore it that is on you.

[verga]

From an outsider's view, I'd say your religion is centered on some female named Mary...

Then come inside to see the truth.

[metmom]

Is the unborn baby a human being?

Is the unborn baby living?

Is the deliberate ending of a human life murder?

[SumProVita]

Are you aware that the WORD is Jesus Christ?

John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

[verga]

How can you read what is CLEARLY said by God and want to change it into something it doesn’t say?

This is My Body, This is My Blood.....

Back attcha

[Iscool]

Yeah that book has been proven to be a bunch of hooey many times, by secular sources.

Hasn't been proven at all...It's claimed to be a bunch of hooey, by Catholics, of course...Just like Two Babylons...You guys claim that was proven false as well...Just more nonsense...

[smvoice]

You can believe anything you want. But Genesis 5:3 says what it says. Take it up with God if you’re not happy with it. IF Adam and Eve had had children BEFORE they sinned, then yes, your argument would have merit. But that is not what happened. Not only that, we are NOT created. We are begotten. Adam and Eve were created.

[Iscool]

I am going to steal this from one of my fellow Catholics. Iron is profitable for the human body to stay alive, does that mean it is the only source of nutrition?

Thank God He didn't trust a Catholic to write his bible...

[verga]

Is the unborn baby a human being? Is the unborn baby living? Is the deliberate ending of a human life murder?

Tell me more about this vaunted protestant unity.

[ronnietherocket3]

I am going to steal this from one of my fellow Catholics. Iron is profitable for the human body to stay alive, does that mean it is the only source of nutrition?

According John 6:52-59 all you need to eat is the flesh of Christ and all you need to drink is the blood of Christ. < sarcasm > Too bad Catholics don't eat Jesus' body and drink his blood.< /sarcasm >

[verga]

see Narses post 103

[SumProVita]

I have no *theory* of creation. I simply believe the Scriptures. I believe that when it says God created man (male and female), He created the in His image. Their sin, however, brought a corruption which affected all of us.

I believe that God sent His Son to pay the price for that sin...whereby mankind can be restored.

[smvoice]

So what you’re saying is God created ALL men and ALL women when He created Adam and Eve?

[SumProVita]

Can you give me the Scripture verses to prove your take on this?

[smvoice]

Post 134. I’ve already given you the Scripture verses to “prove” my take on this. Did you not read them?

[Vigilanteman]

I'd suggest starting with the boigraphy of William Tyndale.

[Iscool]

Between the years 390 and 406 he translated the Old Testament directly from the Hebrew, and this completed work is known today as the "Old Latin Vulgate".

This is completely untrue...A total fabrication...Jerome did not translate the Old Latin...Jerome translated FROM the Old Latin...

There's plenty of history for that, including here...

http://www.fourthcentury.com/jerome-translations-of-scripture/

Jerome actually rejected the Old Latin because it did not agree so much with the LXX...In fact, the Old Latin agrees with the manuscripts used for the KJV...

And since you are so far off on those facts, I suspect the rest of your piece here is just as corrupted...I won't bother to check it out...