No, striving to trying to prove me wrong may be all that matters, but the truth is what matters, and the fact is that the documentation teaches it is still the New American Bible even with revisions, versus your mystery Bible.
“Wrong? Amazing. You claim to be a Catholic in the Roman rite (the liturgical rite used in the Diocese of Rome in the Catholic Church), …”
No. It is not restricted to the Diocese of Rome. See, this is the sort of mistake that amazes me when an anti-Catholic – who will insist he actually knows what he is talking about – makes it. How could you be so wrong?
How could you be so desperate? Because your church is indicted for teaching liberalism? Now read what i said again. The portion at issue is carefully placed in parenthesis to distinguish from what you said, and does not say it is restricted to the Diocese of Rome, but used in it, and which confirms it is a Roman Catholic church, which is your claim! But you claim your church is some sort of nonconformist church in order to deny the NAB was the English text approved by the RC church for use in the United States, as if i had to mean your particular church.
No. Information about my parish will not be given to you. It’s just that simple. If I attend the Roman Rite I am in the Roman Church. Again, how can you not understand something so simple
I do understand how simple it is, meaning you cannot deny the NAB was approved, as said, except as meaning your particular church, even though you will not allow us to test your assertion, as if you are above examination. Like father like son.
“A mystery church and a mystery Bible.”
To you, yes. Deal with it. I have seen how mentally unstable Protestant anti-Catholics are. I see no reason to possibly endanger the people at my parish.
Rather, this is irrational paranoia if you are serious, but which is a rather desperate excuse, and the actual name of your church was not even necessary. Meanwhile we have closer RC churches to attack the people, if we were known for such, but it is not me who has papal sanction for torture and the murder of theological dissidents on my side.
The “church for the Roman Catholic church in America”? You’re not even making sense.
I am not very sure what makes sense to you, but as is well evidenced around here, the Roman Catholic church is in America, and the "NAB being the English text approved by the Church for use in the United States" by the USCCB (as stated) pertains to the Roman Catholic church, not the Anglicans.
“Even if for your church that is not the case.”
What? Again, you’re not making sense.
It is your refusal to ID your specific strand of Roman church that makes no real sense, while that a church of the Roman rite can differ in aspects from those under the USCCB is not the dispute, even if we cannot verify it.
..Amazing mystery Bible.”
No mystery about – except for you.
Yes, me, the one you are debating, and cannot substantiate you claim, if basically irrelevant, and make it the focus in avoiding the real issue that Rome sanctioned the use of the NAB with its liberal notes.
There is no “Bible for RC churches in America”. Parishes can buy whatever Bible they want.
Ignoring context will not score you any points.
“But if anyone and their documentation disagrees with with vladimir’s assertions, then they must be incompetent.”
Agreed
“ Yikes!”
It’s simply true.
Absolutely in-credible! Vladimir has simply spoken, the matter is settled!
Rather than waste time reading and responding to the rest, this is where i decide this exchange will end. Your attempts to find some error in technicalities and degree of sophistry in so doing while avoiding the issue that was my point has been manifestly evidenced.
Which issue is that Rome while you support Rome's censorship, she sanctions liberal scholarship. That remains the fact, as is that the documented evidence states the NAB was "the English text approved [RC] Church for use in the United States" by the USCCB, and is, with revisions.
The End.
Perhaps he can send his buddy Matt Slick the data you seek and you can get it from Matt:)