Sufficient detail exists in my comment for it to not require an explanation.
Which part of it didn’t you understand?
If you cannot clarify what rich irony you see in Christians squabbling over the interpretation of scripture, as if (i suppose) everything must be equally clear, and as if any ambiguity is contrary to gaining true followers, than I am not going to play your game and guess what you all meant. For unlike Scripture, you simply do not warranted the seeking of truth that is necessary for proper receiving, nor provide sufficient context to make more than a guess.