Posted on 10/08/2013 2:47:48 AM PDT by ClaytonP
A majority of Catholics in the United States who attend Mass weekly support same-sex marriage and the ordination of women to the priesthood, according to a Quinnipiac University survey released October 4.
The survey found that 56% of Americans, 53% of Catholics who attend Mass weekly, and 65% of Catholics who attend Mass less frequently would support a law in your state that would allow same-sex couples to get married. Support was stronger among Catholics of ages 18-49 (64%) than ages 50-64 (62%) or 65+ (46%).
According to the survey, 72% of Catholic women back same-sex marriage, while 49% of Catholic men do.
The survey also found that 52% of Catholics who attend Mass weekly, and 66% who attend less frequently, favor the ordination of women to the priesthood. Support was stronger among Catholics of age 65+ (68%) than ages 50-64 (64%) or 18-49 (57%). By a slight (2%) margin, women are more likely to favor womens ordination than men are.
According to the poll, 53% of Americans believe that abortion should be legal in most or all cases, while 49% believe it should be illegal in most or all cases. By a 61%-32% margin, Catholics who attend Mass weekly believe abortion should be illegal in most or all cases; by a 64%-29% margin, Catholics who attend Mass less frequently believe that abortion should be legal in most or all cases. By a slight (2%) margin, women are more likely to oppose abortion than men are.
93% of Catholics who attend Mass weekly, and 85% who attend less frequently, have a favorable or very favorable opinion of Pope Francis.
I know. The Catholic Church should be a democracy, and poll its members to adjust its doctrines to reflect the popular moods of the day. Like some of those other cafeteria "churches".
You just keep watching those founts of wisdom, the polls, and hunting them ignorance and bigotry. Saint Peter will one day reward your fanatical dedication.
Oh dear! Paul’s proselyting must have had “a disastrously bad effect on evangelism” when he argued in the Areopagus.
(Acts 17)
What Paul did in the Areopagus wasn't proselytizing in this modern derogated sense. He didn't offer tangible bribes in exchange for conversion (housing, jobs, medical care, food). He didn't recruit children without their parents' knowledge or consent. He didn't use emotional manipulation. That is proselytism. He went to a forum and made a straight, honest and persuasive appeal to his fellow citizens. That is evangelism.
“This poll was done outside the doors after mass?”
They say live interviewers called land lines and cell phones. Data from 392 Catholics. That wouldn’t fill up a moderately large sized church, it is a fraction of a single average parish. Don’t say what areas they called, as far as I can tell.
There’s a reason opinion polling on the ‘gay marriage’ issue usually involves a false bias as pro ‘gay marriage’ that is revealed when actual popular votes are made. It has to do with telling a stranger over the phone what one thinks about gay marriage. The voting booth is a secret ballot.
Freegards
Amen.
That’s why we have dictionaries. What is silly is the blatant attempts to rework the English language to suit religious prejudice.
To proselytize simply means to attempt to change a persons view or opinion whatever the message. To evangelize is to use a specific message to convert or change a view. Six of one, half dozen of another.
They were baptized with water, weren't they???
That's why --- unless your purpose is limited to crossword puzzles --- definitions consisting of more than one word enable you to convey the meaningful differences between proselytism and evangelism, both in word and in practice.
It's like the difference between "cult," "faith," and "church".
Or "teach," "train," and "indoctrinate".
Or any number of similar words with different connotations in different contexts.
So much for the “cafeteria Catholic” excuse.
Quinnipiac
we know that in the end times MOST professed Christians will be fakes embracing sin.
Until recently had Paul tried to preach publicly (proselytize) as he did in the forum he would have been arrested and jailed by Greek authorities at the behest of the Greek Orthodox Church.
“There are different connotations as well as legal distinctions in different countries.”
Of course there is and the connotations are false and an excuse to deny religious freedom to unpopular or minority religious groups.
You'll see the same thing here, when Christians try to protect their kids from indoctrination or proselytization or, excuse me, recruitment by Scientologists or Hare Krishnas("But that's a cult!") or Gay Christan Ministries.
You’re wandering off into the thickets of child recruitment, etc.
The question was the meaning or a common English word and it’s distortion.
I know its a farce. And if they did the poll during Christmass and Easter just outside the church door I still would not believe it. Why because their are people who never go except on those days for nostalgia only. LOL!!!
Does that mean that most Catholic churches are not doing a very good job tending the flocks?More to the point, it means
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.