Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
You are begging the question, presuming what needs to be proved, which is that r that even if Rome truly has an unbroken line of popes from Peter, which is historically problematic even based on scholarship from RCs, then historical descent is the basis for authenticity.

Unbroken line of popes? From the church that admits that it has and can elect the *wrong* man????

There can't be an unbroken line of popes when the *wrong* man is elected.

So much for their claim of authenticity and being the OTC.

pffftttt.......

812 posted on 10/04/2013 10:35:29 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Unbroken line of popes? From the church that admits that it has and can elect the *wrong* man????

Proof.

814 posted on 10/04/2013 10:47:03 AM PDT by verga (Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
There can't be an unbroken line of popes when the *wrong* man is elected.

there has been an unbroken line of presidents even though we have suffered through Roosevelt, Carter, Clinton and Obama.

921 posted on 10/04/2013 8:53:48 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson