I did not see anyone painting Jesus as a sinner, while making an individual mortal or ruling body as possessing assured infallibility (whenever speaking universally on faith and morals) is cultic. Even those whom Scripture affirms sat in the seat of Moses did not possess this, though they much acted as if they did, and were thus reproved the Lord using Scripture.
And as i often have said, which, as the assured word of God, is the infallible standard, while apostolic authority was established based upon Scriptural substantiation, in word and in power.
...for ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of GOD careful now, Jesus was 100% man as well as 100% God, did His 100% man part commit a sin??....how about that angry scene with the money changers in the temple....did He sin by losing His temper???did He err in destroying property that didn't belong to him, did He fall short by depriving people of their livlihood??? - Terycarl
The implication is pretty clear. To me, it sounds a little like the serpent speaking to Eve...
Genesis 3: 3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”