“Catholics have repeatedly refered to the posting of scriptures as “anti-catholic hate.”
Really? Then kindly point out to me where this, from the article, is found in Scripture: ”On the other hand, if Jesus was speaking in figurative language then this teaching becomes the most blasphemous and deceptive hoax any religion could impose on its people.”
You speak untruly when you say, “Catholics have repeatedly refered to the posting of scriptures as “anti-catholic hate.”
That has never occurred. Never. Not once. It is commentary such as I cite above that is objectionable, and as hard as I try I am unable to see how you could, in good faith, make that mistake.
You are completely mistaken.
Posting of scripture is constantly called anti-catholic hate, especially in recent weeks. It is becoming more and more common here.
As for your question, Yehova’s commandments specifically limit what kinds of “flesh” we can eat, and that of a human is not allowed.
Actually, most catholics know that eating his flesh is purely figurative; its just the rabid deceivers that argue otherwise.