Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

Mary was hardly in the background in the first two Chapters of Luke. As for our veneration of Mary, it is of an entirely different sort that the Apostles would have paid to the person of the mother of Jesus. She does not seem to have traveled with him in Galilee. They could hardly have know about the circumstances of his birth from him. Until after the Resurrection, they would have thought such a story to be as preposterous as moderns today do. We don’t know how Luke and Matthew came to include the stories in their Gospels. Marcion, who made Luke his only Gospel, left off the first two chapters because the doctrine of the incarnation did not fit his theology.


83 posted on 09/13/2013 7:29:00 PM PDT by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
You can use all the “man’s wisdom” you want but it still constitutes “another gospel”. Preach it if you want but remember the Holy Spirit’s words ” let him be accursed”.
85 posted on 09/13/2013 7:39:21 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS

You raise a very good point here that I have often pondered.

Scripture never records Jesus telling the Apostles about His birth or life before His public ministry so from whom did the Apostles learn about it?


147 posted on 09/16/2013 6:19:21 PM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson