Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
No, RCC theology was developed using Latin. Christian theology was developed around Hebrew and Greek. That apostles did not write in Latin.

I said Christian theology, not the Christian Scriptures. The concept of the ecclesia in the Latin church is the same as ἐκκλησία in the Greek church.

Um, the point is that the concept of what many people think today as “church” was not a concept that was used in the time of the apostles. I don’t care “how old it is”. What the apostles taught is what is to be believed. Nothing else.

No, the point is that the word church is only what English speakers use to render ἐκκλησία/ecclesia which is found in the New Testament. Its etymological derivation is meaningless since the Christian understanding of ἐκκλησία/ecclesia/church predates the English language.

59 posted on 09/12/2013 6:52:18 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Petrosius; metmom
>>No, the point is that the word church is only what English speakers use to render ἐκκλησία/ecclesia which is found in the New Testament.<<

No, it was a perversion of scripture by the RCC. Ecclesia NEVER meant “church” as the RCC portrays it nor how many people today understand it.

62 posted on 09/12/2013 7:54:58 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson