Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12; SECURE AMERICA; driftdiver; Alex Murphy; St_Thomas_Aquinas
Isn't that way outdated, isn't that 10-15 billion dollar figure from a Time magazine article from 1965 for instance?

So, since the Vatican is "rich," it should sell all its churches, schools, hospitals, orphanages, Vatican City, etc., and give that money to the poor, right? And what exactly would that achieve, besides assuring subsequent generations never receive any of the help and benefits from those same churches, schools, hospitals, orphanages, Vatican City, etc.?

BOOMTOWN 2: Taxpayers Have Spent $15 Trillion on 'War on Poverty'

That's just one country, and its been a complete and utter failure at that.

All those who cry about the "Vatican's riches" are fools or tools, IMHO.

43 posted on 08/28/2013 2:40:55 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Kopp DPM
The Myth of Vatican Wealth–on Helping the Poor
45 posted on 08/28/2013 2:43:52 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Why change the subject?

Personally I’m just interested in what appears to be some fake claims about the lack of assets in the Catholic church.

I think that just about any billionaire or investment group would jump at the chance to pay “1 billion dollars”! for just the total Vatican assets, of the total wealth of the Catholic denomination.


47 posted on 08/28/2013 2:57:50 PM PDT by ansel12 (Obama-[obamacare] "used to be a Republican idea. There's a governor of Massachusetts who set it up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
So, since the Vatican Joel Osteen is "rich," it he should sell all its churches, schools, hospitals, orphanages, Vatican City Lakewood Church, his old mansion, his new mansion, etc., and give that money to the poor, right? And what exactly would that achieve, besides assuring subsequent generations never receive any of the help and benefits from those same churches, schools, hospitals, orphanages, etc.?

Did I get that right? After all, isn't that the underlying point of Longnecker's article? That Joel Osteen is part of the eeeeevillllll 1%, and the [current] Pope is really one of the 99%?

Related threads:
March participants say Occupy movement’s concerns aligned with Catholic social teaching
US bishops call for continued unemployment benefits
Catholics 'more likely to back state economic intervention' [European Central Bank study]
CARA suggests polls on creation of a third party: Christian Democrats
Time for True Democrats to Start Their Own Party [or, why Catholics can't vote Democrat any more]
Pope Francis's Economics: Yes, He Has A Leftist View Of Free Markets

57 posted on 08/28/2013 3:58:22 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Just a common, ordinary, simple savior of America's destiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Did I say anything about selling? Nope, bzzzzt try again.

I was replying to someone who said the value in monetary terms of the vatican was $1B. Now that you have the context you didn’t bother to read before you can apply your vast learning and take another shot.


60 posted on 08/28/2013 4:03:21 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson