Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o; Iscool
It does not follow, though, that His body was bloodless. It seems to me that making more blood --- blood that would not pour out of wounds --- would be part of the miracle of his brilliant new form of life. (Leviticus says "Life is in the blood.") So on the other hand, to be completely deprived, drained of blood --- koshered like meat --- would not be a glorious transformation. It would be a pitiful thing, a deprivation.

Except for this pesky verse....

1 Corinthians 15:50-53 I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality.

158 posted on 08/06/2013 12:51:25 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
I'm not sure what you are concluding from this. Are you saying that Christ's flesh and blood was not raised from the dead, since "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God"?

That would not be a valid conclusion, since Christ said, "Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.” (Luke 24:39)

The NT uses "flesh" in a number of strikingly different ways, sometimes highly positive ("And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt amongst us"), ("Unless you eat My Flesh and drink my Blood, you shall not have life within you"), sometimes negative (Galatians 5:17 For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another.)

Not only that, but the spirit that denies that Jesus came in the flesh, is identified as the spirit of the Antichrist. And again Paul says "the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh." (2 Corinthians 4:11)

So one must be careful not to deny the true Incarnation of Jesus as the Word made Flesh, or His true Resurrection, not as a "ghost," but as a man whose very physical being is reconstituted and transformed in a miraculous way, so he can say that even bodily, "It is I Myself."

When Paul says "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God," he's not talking about Christ's flesh and blood! He's talking about carnal-minded, thud-headed man, a slave to lust, unaided by grace, untransformed.

"By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God." 1 John 4:2

165 posted on 08/06/2013 2:00:30 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson