You are mistaken completely, and appear to desire to be mistaken.
Hislop did painstaking research, all of which is noted in his book, and well beyond attack from the nicolaitans that desire not to be exposed.
Your embrace of nicolaitans and their corruption is getting to be a clear picture.
“Hislop did painstaking research”
Why then does no one else confirm that Semiaramis was a soprano?
Again - he’s as historically credible as Joseph Smith. Did he ever travel to Mesopotamia, or did he just dig out a few books and dabble?
Dan Brown is the exact same way, and he is popular for the exact same reason. Historical facts get in the way of a good conspiracy! What’s next, freemasons?