Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

“The subtitle for Hislop’s book is “The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife.” Yet when I went to reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica, The Americana, The Jewish Encyclopædia, The Catholic Encyclopædia, The Worldbook Encyclopædia - carefully reading their articles on “Nimrod” and “Semiramis” - not one said anything about Nimrod and Semiramis being husband and wife. They did not even live in the same century. Nor is there any basis for Semiramis being the mother of Tammuz.”

In short Hislop is a fabricator.

You deserve better than to fall to a liar.


668 posted on 07/15/2013 5:29:48 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

Hislop is absolutely correct.

He fabricated nothing.

You grasp at straws.

Read the prophets where it is all recorded. (I know how much catholics hate the word, especially Torah and Tanakh)


716 posted on 07/15/2013 7:26:52 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson