Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge; circlecity

“Jerome was concerned that he lacked hebrew originals.”


Jerome wasn’t concerned that he lacked the “Hebrew originals.” He was concerned that the Jews did not consider them canonical, and so did not include them. 1 Maccabees is available in Hebrew, so he said, but he did not include it. There are no new “manuscripts” that suddenly make Judith, for example, canonical scripture, despite it being filled with historical and geographical errors.


217 posted on 07/14/2013 5:23:18 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

“Jerome wasn’t concerned that he lacked the “Hebrew originals.”

Which again is why the list of books coincides with his list of hebrew originals. ;) Also why Luther himself cites the EXACT SAME argument.

I’m sorry, but I’m gonna go with what Jerome and Luther actually said.


220 posted on 07/14/2013 5:26:39 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson