Nope simple statement of fact.
I thought Catholics were up on their history and not prone to jump right on a comment without knowing if it is correct or not.
The majority of the posts at that point were about Galileo, if you had meant someone else YOU should have been more specific, like I said YOUR fault and yes I do still forgive you your trespasses.
I always forget that doing that is SOP.
For protestants. It is part of that whole intellectual dishonesty thing and bearing false witness that you all are so good at.
Do you have an answer to my question in the post you are replying to?
Why yes I do as soon as you are honest enough to tell me who you were specifically referring to. If not I will just ignore your posts.
If you have no answer, we shall concede that your statement in question has no Biblical basis.
Assume what ever you like, I am already over it and you.
Not a fact at all, it just showed that you deceived yourself.
The majority of the posts at that point were about Galileo, if you had meant someone else YOU should have been more specific, like I said YOUR fault and yes I do still forgive you your trespasses.
Hmmm, still the accuser of the brethren, eh? You know who is the chief accuser, right? It appears you are emulating the enemy.
Because you are not up on your denominations history, you blame me. LOL, more SOP.
So because you assumed I was referring to someone you are familiar with, I'm wrong? LOL again.
I always forget that doing that is SOP.I'm not a Protestant, but according to your statement there, you are doing what you accuse them of. *sigh*For protestants. It is part of that whole intellectual dishonesty thing and bearing false witness that you all are so good at.
Do you have an answer to my question in the post you are replying to?That's not the way it works, I asked you 3 times, this is the first time you have asked me that question. I figured you would have found it by now if you are at all familiar with your denomination's history.Why yes I do as soon as you are honest enough to tell me who you were specifically referring to.
If not I will just ignore your posts.
No problem, I am used to Catholics and Mormons going to cricket mode when they have been called on their erroneous statements.
That's alright, there are plenty of posters that back up what they say instead of copping out and tossing out false accusations and statements.
If you have no answer, we shall concede that your statement in question has no Biblical basis.It's not an assumption, now it is a solid fact. I'll take that comment as conceding.Assume what ever you like, I am already over it and you.
You believe that Jesus authorized the Catholic Church to burn those at the stake (even Christians!) that question it's way of doing business.
OH and BTW Hus was burned with fuel of Wycliffe's manuscripts.
What else your denomination decided to burn him for besides trying to get the Word of God out to the people is a moot point.
An old woman threw a small bit of fuel on the fire, to which Hus exclaimed: "Sancta Simplicitas!" (Holy Simplicity!)
Bye, I'll miss your...ah...er..."communications"....