“Well if you are citing him as authoritative source shouldn’t he be? Doh those pesky facts.”
I’m not even sure what you’re talking about. I wasn’t citing anyone as an authority. I was just pointing out that your “interpretation” consists of removing words from the verse. And then I gave two different points of view (my own, and someone else’s) on what the verse does mean, when the word you omitted is returned.
I’m guessing it’s a Catholic thing that makes you assume nobody else thinks for themselves.
It’s a really simple question - why does ‘random person you cited’ have any credibility on interpreting scripture?