“My KJV does not have the path to salvation going through Rome.”
Instead yours goes through Canterbury. Is that better to go through Canterbury than Rome?
“It does not make Mary a goddess of heaven”
Something the Catholic church does not teach.
“and man’s rituals as prerequisite to finding Jesus.”
Yet you elevate Strongs = scripture. Do you not see this?
“My KJV is nondenominational”
Then you are ignorant of history.
“Soon after Elizabeth I took the throne in 1558, the flaws of both the Great Bible and the Geneva Bible (namely, that the Geneva Bible did not “conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its beliefs about an ordained clergy”) became painfully apparent”.
“and leaves the Creator in charge.”
Only if the Creator is Henry VIII!
“This conversation reminds me of when God set up His government (Judges) with the newly freed peoples out of Egypt and they demanded to have a king”
And you are one of the ones demanding a King! Absolutely, I agree with this statement.
“History does tend to repeat itself and we in the flesh sure like to have flesh masters we can worship.”
Which is why you’ve submitted to one already.
Instead yours goes through Canterbury. Is that better to go through Canterbury than Rome?
Surely you are joking? Canterbury?
“It does not make Mary a goddess of heaven”
Something the Catholic church does not teach.
Next time I see the reference made I will make sure I ping you to Mary being the goddess of heaven.
“and man’s rituals as prerequisite to finding Jesus.”
Yet you elevate Strongs = scripture. Do you not see this?
Elevate? It is a tool - to show me words used from the original languages and their possible more than one meaning, wherein the translator either in ignorance or means to deceive chose their own word. I was not there when the writing occurred so I have no way to discern motive. But making Passover to be easter did NOT come from God. And yet the majority of Christians practice the ancient festival of easter as if that makes it Christian.
“My KJV is nondenominational”
Then you are ignorant of history.
Whose history? There is so much history revised and extended it is laughable.
“Soon after Elizabeth I took the throne in 1558, the flaws of both the Great Bible and the Geneva Bible (namely, that the Geneva Bible did not “conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its beliefs about an ordained clergy”) became painfully apparent”.
Ah, and the majority of Christians would not have chosen/elected the holy prophets that God chose. See I am not affixed to a denomination. What seems to get missed through all the chatter is that Paul said in ICorinthians 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples (examples): and they are written for our admonition (warning, upon whom the ends of the world (age) are come...
Denominations come and go and evolve and devolve, but, what has happened is in the process of happening again. Seems to me that to be aware of what happened so one can observed the recurrence as it repeats is the purpose of the instruction book. Christ said let no man deceive you... so what is the deception? Christ spoke plainly, He even explained His parables in private to His disciples.
“and leaves the Creator in charge.”
Only if the Creator is Henry VIII!
I guess you have not had the "Luther" is the devil class yet.
“This conversation reminds me of when God set up His government (Judges) with the newly freed peoples out of Egypt and they demanded to have a king”
And you are one of the ones demanding a King! Absolutely, I agree with this statement.
Why my KJV says without doubt there is but one King of Kings and Lord of Lords... What is to demand?
“History does tend to repeat itself and we in the flesh sure like to have flesh masters we can worship.”
Which is why you’ve submitted to one already.
I do not believe we speak the same language....