Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
One would think that with all of the claims about what the Gospel authors and Early Church Fathers actually said and really meant you would rely on a more accurate translation of the Bible than the KJV. Peace be with you

The 'early church fathers' lesson plans came from the holy prophets. Just like Peter writes. And for the English reader the KJV allows the language barrier to be crossed with Strong's. See what the majority of modern Christians are not instructed is the NEW does not contradict the so called OLD. Christ continually quoted the holy prophets, which made them one and the same as His Gospel. Moses was the first holy prophet as well as being the law giver. There is no need for the evolutionary track forming new traditions down through the ages.

How else is it possible for Christ to have said before one jot or tittle of the so called new ever got placed on plant fibers or animal skins ... Mark 13:23 But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things. Then Christ proceeds to make Isaiah 13:10 part of the Gospel, as noted in Mark 13:24.

And things are right on schedule as The Heavenly Father had His elected holy prophets pen, routinely called the Old Testament.

Wonder why there was a parable of the 10 virgins?

1,675 posted on 06/10/2013 10:04:23 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1670 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

“And for the English reader the KJV allows the language barrier to be crossed with Strong’s”

And where precisely does this tradition of men originate?


1,679 posted on 06/10/2013 10:06:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1675 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson